AI transformation, built and run with you
We find the one process in your company worth putting AI into first, then build it with you. It starts with an audit. The price is $2,500–$5,000, agreed with you before any work starts, and it ends on day 14 with a written plan and the sums shown. If we find nothing worth improving, you don't pay.
Companies of 20 to 200 people. Not startups, not large groups.
Arun Agrahri & Cédric Giorgi
"We don't sell what we haven't lived. Two of us run this whole company with no operations staff: the AI processes every meeting the same night, writes the Sunday report, and keeps the CRM honest. We built ours in the same order we will build yours."
The audit
Then the build, then we run it, both priced from the audit. Stop whenever it stops paying.
AI Transformation Strategy
214 slides · phase 1 of 4 · month six
New message · someone you've never met
"Hey! I noticed you run a company. I can automate everything you do by Friday. Quick call this week?"
A third offer is coming from the company that already sells you your phones and your printers. They will get the meeting, because you already pay them. They can sell you licences and a training day. None of the three writes down how your company decides, and that is the part the AI needs most.
There is another way to start. Fourteen days, one price you can see. You come out knowing the one process to begin with, why that one, and what a year of running it the current way costs you. Then you decide.
How it works
Your company already runs on a manual nobody has written down: where things are, how they move, and what your people decide without being asked. An AI that has not been told any of that will guess, and it will sound certain. So we write it down first, then build the systems that run it with you.
The order we build in
Most AI projects start at the last layer with nothing under it. That is why the demonstration works and the real thing does not. A tool that answers your customers is only as good as the information behind it, and the judgment behind that.
We work down the list in order. Every layer is worth something on its own, so you can stop at any one of them and keep what you have. The mark against each one shows the usual split between what the audit settles, what we build, and what we keep running. Your own order can move that line.
Where your information lives
One honest picture of what you know, and where it actually sits today.
Getting your systems talking
Your existing tools, connected, so nobody retypes the same thing twice.
How your company decides
Your house rules, written down: the judgment your team applies without thinking. This is the layer nobody else installs, and it is why their answers could be any company's.
The first workflow
One process, running end to end, on the work you already do every week.
Weekly quality checks
Someone measures whether it is still right, every week, and shows you.
Your own skill library
Each thing we build stays yours, reusable, and adds to what came before.
The AI that runs it
Last, and only once the six above it are in place. It works in the background, and your team approves the results.
How we choose
Run those three against a process in your head right now. Hours every week, information in more than one place, more than one person touching it. If a process has all three, you have just found the one we would start with. The audit puts a number on what one more year of running it the current way costs you.
Every engagement is fixed in scope and credits toward the next step. You are never buying a retainer on faith.
What happens after you apply
Thirty minutes, free. Either one of us names a process worth fixing, or one of us says there is not one here and we stop. It costs you half an hour and you sign nothing.
The deep dive is where the value is: 90 minutes inside how the work actually moves through your company. You'll know the price before anyone asks you to decide, and what comes back is yours whether or not you build with us.
How the company runs and where it hurts. Either of us can say this isn't a fit, and that's a fine outcome.
Your processes, your tools, your numbers, and who has to be involved in each of them.
We show you what we're finding before we finish it, so nothing goes off in the wrong direction.
The finished written plan, line by line: findings, the arithmetic, what to build first, then the price.
$2.5–5K
Fourteen days at most, one fixed deliverable. Which single process to start with, what a year of the current way costs you, and who inside the company has to own it for it to hold.
$2.5K covers most companies. It moves toward $5K when more people are involved, more processes are in scope, or your information sits in more places.
What the audit costs, day by day
If it finds nothing worth building, you don't pay.
Apply for an auditNeither of these is a decision you make today. You see the build price at the walkthrough on day 14, before you decide anything, and the audit is the whole commitment until then.
scoped
4 to 12 weeks, fixed scope. We build exactly what the audit scoped, in the order it laid out, with a working demo in a shared channel every working day.
Priced from what the audit finds. You see the number before you decide anything.
scoped
The system, run for you: weekly quality checks, fixes when something drifts, and a new capability every month, so it compounds instead of decays.
Priced once we know what we are running for you. Monthly, and you can stop.
See it worked through
Five worked examples, one per sector: what the audit found, what we would build first, and what the week looks like afterwards. The companies are examples built from firms like yours, for demonstration only, and the arithmetic is printed beside every figure.
Proof
Our company runs Sena, AI that matches people at live industry events, used by teams who don't write software. And the company itself runs on a private skill library: 20-plus AI systems that do the operational work of a staff we never hired.
Two founders, no operations team. The seven layers do that work.
We publish how each one works, what it cost to build, and which ones we switched off because they were not worth the attention.
// how two people run a whole company
meeting-review · every transcript processed, tasks filed. 18:00, Mon–Sat
weekly-report · Sunday synthesis, catches what we forgot
prospect-research · pre-meeting brief from a website URL
event-report · post-event analysis and CRM export
sponsor-enrichment · every sponsor researched before we ask
whatsapp-broadcast · event comms drafted and delivered
event-expert · our own analyst, briefed on the whole industry
+ the house library · research, content, SEO, outreach
your company gets its own →
Managing Partner
Serial founder based in San Francisco, with two exits (Snap and Manulife). Builds the systems, writes the letters, and runs the ones behind our own company as well as yours.
LinkedIn
Managing Partner
Twenty years in European tech, from Sigfox to co-founding La French Tech Toulouse. Works alongside your team on the ground, and hosts Conversations: owners of traditional businesses on what AI actually changed.
LinkedInThe letter
Essays from running our own company on AI, and from the work inside other people's. What worked, what broke, what it cost. Written for owners, not engineers.
Each one names a system, what it cost to build, and whether it is still running.
Conversations · the podcast
Cédric sits down with owners of traditional businesses who put AI to work inside their companies. No vendors, no futurists, no demos: just what actually changed.
First conversations are being recorded now.
That's exactly who this is for. We build around the work you already do: invoices, quotes, follow-ups, reporting, hiring. Your team keeps working the way they know; the system adapts to them, not the other way around.
They can sell you licences and a training day, and if that's what you need, take it. Ours is a different job: we go inside one process, change how it runs end to end, and stay until it holds. Two questions worth asking them: who writes down your team's judgment so the AI applies it, and who checks every week that it's still right.
No. It works in the background, inside the tools your team already opens. What reaches a person is a draft, a suggestion or an exception, and their job is to approve it, correct it, or say no. Nothing new to log into, no course to sit through. Every new step starts with a person checking each result, and only runs on its own once it has been right for two weeks straight.
Plenty of firms will audit you for nothing, and three of the twelve we reviewed in August 2026 do. If a free review is all you need, take it. The difference is what you keep at the end. A free audit ends in a proposal to sell you the next thing. This one ends in a priced written plan you own, with the sums under it, and it costs you nothing if there is nothing in it worth building.
A consultancy will sell you a strategy before anything works. A freelancer will sell you a script without a system around it. We sell staged, fixed-scope steps where each one credits toward the next, and you can stop at any point and keep everything we've delivered.
It is not an inspection. Nobody arrives to collect your documents and grade you. It is two conversations: 30 minutes, free, to see whether there is anything here worth doing, then 90 minutes going deep on how the work actually moves through your company. What comes back is the one thing to build first, why that one, and what it returns. Where a number can't be measured, we leave it blank instead of estimating it.
AI systems decay without attention, which is why the operated tier exists: weekly quality checks, fixes when something breaks, and a new capability shipped every month. If you'd rather run it yourself, you own everything we build, including the skill library.
You do. The system, the documentation, and the private skill library: your team's judgment, written down so the AI runs things your way. We hand off cleanly whether you keep us on or not.
From $2.5K, fixed scope, half of it off the build if you go ahead within 30 days, and the first call is free. You'll know what to build, in what order, and what it gives back, before you commit to building it.
Tell us the one process that costs you most. One of us reads every application and answers it with a name.
We invoice in US dollars from Sena Technologies, Inc.; the French page shows the same amounts in euros.
We reply within two business days, always with a name. No sequence, no chasing.